INTRODUCTORY
The City Council of the City of Columbia, Missouri met for
a regular meeting at 7:00 p.m., on Monday, December 18, 2000, in the Council
Chamber of the City of Columbia Missouri. The roll was taken with the following
results: Council Members CRAYTON, JANKU, CROCKETT, CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, and
HINDMAN were present. The City Manager, City Counselor, City Clerk, and various
Department Heads were also present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of December 4, 2000, were
approved unanimously by voice vote on a motion made by Mr. Campbell and a second
by Mrs. Crockett.
APPROVAL AND ADJUSTMENT OF AGENDA INCLUDING CONSENT AGENDA
The agenda, including the Consent Agenda, was approved unanimously
by voice vote on a motion made by Mr. Campbell and a second by Mr. Coffman.
SPECIAL ITEMS
R251-00 Authorizing FY 2001 Human Rights
Enhancement Contracts.
The resolution was read by the Clerk.
Marie Glaze, Chair of the Human Rights Commission, explained
that out of the ten proposals received this year, the Commission is recommending
nine. She reported they suggest that the full $3,500 in funding be approved.
Mr. Steinhaus explained the purpose of the program is to give
the Commission an opportunity to develop contacts with other Human Rights organizations
within the community. He noted that the small amount of funding goes a long way
for many smaller organizations that provide human rights related activities.
He stated that the process requires a 50/50 match. Mr. Steinhaus indicated this
is the fifth year for the program and he is pleased with the number and quality
of the applications they have received.
The vote on R251-00 was recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CRAYTON,
JANKU, CROCKETT, CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN. VOTING NO: NO ONE. Resolution
declared adopted, reading as follows:
SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS
Ward #1 Children - Michael Whitley - Sidewalks in Ward 1
Luke Chandra, 303 Alexander read a letter from six children
in the First Ward who are concerned about their community. The request was for
sidewalks and speed bumps in their neighborhood. The letter went on to say that
the kids do not have a safe place to ride their bikes between Hirth, Sanford,
Alexander, Worley and Ash Streets. They asked the Council to approve and implement
a plan to create a safe place for them to grow.
Mayor Hindman told the young men that the Council is very
interested in making their neighborhood safer for them. He said the staff would
be looking into the situation.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
B394-00 Amending the Broadway Farms
Business Park O-P Development Plan.
The bill was read by the Clerk.
Mayor Hindman noted that the proponent had requested that
this issue be tabled to the January 2, 2001, meeting.
Mr. Patterson explained that the Council had asked the developer
and engineer to address certain issues related to traffic penetrating the neighborhood,
in addition to the right in/right out on Fairview and the easement access control
on Broadway. Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
William Woodward, 200A Unity, voiced his concern about traffic
in the area.
Mr. Campbell made the motion that B394-00 be tabled to the
January 2, 2001, meeting. The motion was seconded by Ms. Crayton and approved
unanimously by voice vote.
Mayor Hindman continued the public hearing.
B404-00 Authorizing construction of
water mains serving Bearfield Meadows, Plat 1; providing for payment
of
differential costs.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained City policy related to paying differential
costs associated with larger mains needed for development. In this case, he said
twelve and eight inch lines are being requested. The estimated cost for the City's
portion, to be paid out of Water and Light funds, would be $17,752.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
There being no comments, Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
B404-00 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CRAYTON, JANKU, CROCKETT, CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN.
VOTING NO: NO ONE. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:
B405-00 Authorizing construction of
water main serving Spencer Hills, Plat 2; providing for payment of
differential
costs.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck noted that the estimated cost for this project in
northeast Columbia is $3,700.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
There being no comments, Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
B405-00 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CRAYTON, JANKU, CROCKETT, CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN.
VOTING NO: NO ONE. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:
B413-00 Amending Chapter 25 of the
Code as it relates to sidewalks.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck reported that the Council has held a series of public
work sessions in addition to the public hearings held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission on this subject. He noted the Commission's recommendation is to require
the construction of five foot sidewalks in all areas except along residential
streets that do not adjoin facilities such as schools, churches, parks, etc.,
in which case they may be four feet in width.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
Dee Dokken, 208 Sanford, spoke on behalf of the Greenbelt
Coalition. She commented that the Coalition supports any change that would improve
pedestrian travel. Ms. Dokken indicated the Coalition favored five foot walks
in all areas because more space would be provided for wheelchairs as well as
allowing two pedestrians to walk side by side. She reported the Coalition also
believed that wider sidewalks should be accompanied by a comparable decrease
in the width of streets. Ms. Dokken stated that an increase in impervious surfaces
causes flooding and erosion, decreased storm water quality, and degradation of
streams. In addition, narrower streets would serve as a traffic calming device.
John Clark, 403 N. Ninth, stated he is a member of the Bicycle/Pedestrian
Commission and its Sidewalks, Crosswalks and Crossings Subcommittee. He explained
the proposed alternative being brought forward is from the Subcommittee and not
the Commission. The first proposal pertained to Subsection A in which they recommended
that the notion of width be qualified by the terms "clear width" and "shy width" or "shy
space". Regarding the exception of four foot walks except when adjoining parks,
etc., Mr. Clark said if there was a subdivision of 100 houses, wider walks would
be needed so that area residents could access those facilities. The Subcommittee
also believed that old subdivision plats should be subject to the new rules.
Karl Skala, 5201 Gasconade, noted that the Metro 2020 Plan
recommends five foot sidewalks on arterial and collector streets and four foot
sidewalks on residential streets. He also supported the recommendation that for
those who are granted sidewalk variances, these individuals would be required
to contribute some money to a fund to address the placement of in-fill walks
for areas that do not fall under these ordinances.
Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
Mayor Hindman asked if sidewalk variance requests would go
to the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Dudark said they would not -- the Planning and
Zoning Commission would review the variances first and then the request would
be forwarded on to the Council. Mayor Hindman wondered about procedures regarding
certificates of occupancy and the three year period. Mr. Patterson explained
that the current enforcement mechanism is the certificate of occupancy. He reported
this simply ensures that before somebody can occupy a residence or building,
a sidewalk must be in place. He indicated the performance contract kicks-in if
the walk is not constructed within three years of the final platting. Mayor Hindman
asked about old plats. Mr. Dudark remarked that staff had found only five old
plats, some of which are obsolete and will most likely be replatted before being
developed. When a request for a replat occurs, that would trigger the new requirements.
Mr. Dudark did not see old plats as a big problem.
Mr. Coffman asked how the plats were determined to be obsolete.
Mr. Dudark explained that was determined because they have been around since
the 1950's and early 60's. He said some of the standards have changed and they
probably would not develop under the current market.
Mr. Janku asked about the comment regarding "clear width".
Mr. Dudark responded that staff did not see how that could be implemented because
existing street signs and trees would prevent such from being possible. He thought
this condition might be possible when a street is being designed, but to make
it a regulation seems rather difficult.
Mayor Hindman said he would support the amendment but added
that he has significant reservations about it. He thought five foot sidewalks
in residential areas would be best. Mayor Hindman believed the amendment provided
great progress over existing ordinances; however, he concluded this topic will
need to be revisited when the street width issues are discussed. Mayor Hindman
expressed his appreciation for all of the work done by the various commissions.
Mr. Campbell was hopeful a street width standard of 26 or
28 feet will be adopted. He said that would make a very different picture in
terms of green space.
Mr. Coffman asked about the City's design standards and specifications
in regards to "shy space". Mr. Patterson explained that the City's street standards
addresses ADA criteria and such things as that. He noted staff is in the process
of reissuing specifications with some modifications, but this becomes difficult
when retrofitting existing sidewalks or when new sidewalks are situated on a
property line.
B413-00 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CRAYTON, JANKU, CROCKETT, CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN.
VOTING NO: NO ONE. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:
(A) Voluntary annexation of property
located on the northeast corner of State Route WW and Rustic Road.
Item A was read by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained that this 20 acre tract is owned by the
American Legion Post 202. He reported the Legion has agreed to dedicate to the
City all of the land that has been utilized for park purposes over a number of
years. He said the City would be providing a sewer line to the property as a
part of the overall agreement with the Legion. Mr. Beck indicated the American
Legion has requested permanent C-P zoning on one tract, and the other tract would
continue to be used for recreational purposes. He said questions have been raised
about the C-P request.
Mr. Dudark explained that there is another bill associated
with this voluntary annexation request that is scheduled for introduction this
evening. He stated there are options included in the staff report the Council
may wish to consider before the final vote at the next meeting.
Mr. Beck expressed the City's appreciation to the American
Legion for the use of this property. He remarked it has been a real benefit to
our recreation programs.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
There being no comments, Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
OLD BUSINESS
B402-00 Accepting a donation for the
acquisition and training of a canine for the Columbia Police Department;
appropriating
funds.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Chief Boehm explained that this is a donation of $8,500 from
the Cosmopolitan Luncheon Club. He reported this group has been long-term supporters
of the Police Department in that this will be the fourth canine purchased by
the Cosmo Club throughout the years. Chief Boehm commented with this donation,
the Police Department will have two canines in operation as part of their team.
It is hoped that both dogs will be in service by early spring.
Mayor Hindman thanked the Club for their contribution.
B402-00 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CRAYTON, JANKU, CROCKETT, CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN.
VOTING NO: NO ONE. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:
B411-00 Voluntary annexation of land
located on the north side of State Route K, west of Old Village Road.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained that this three acre tract is being recommended
for annexation by the staff.
B411-00 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CRAYTON, JANKU, CROCKETT, CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN.
VOTING NO: NO ONE. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:
B412-00 Granting a variance from the
Subdivision Regulations relating to sidewalk construction along
Ridgeway
Avenue, Mikel Street and Sexton Road.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Dudark explained the Planning and Zoning Commission's
recommendation. He said the property has been recently platted and has frontage
on three streets. He noted that the streets have been improved with curbs and
gutters. The Commission recommended approval of the variances on Ridgeway and
Sexton without conditions. Mr. Dudark reported the Commission approved the variance
on Mikel with the condition that when the City completes the improvement of this
street, then the property owner would be obligated to construct that section
of sidewalk bordering his property. He remarked that the property owner is willing
to enter into an agreement with the City to that effect.
Stanley Evans, 2101 W. Broadway, explained that he is the
owner of the property. He confirmed his willingness to sign an agreement in reference
to the construction of a sidewalk on Mikel Street. He remarked that he would
also prefer to build the sidewalk on the inside of the trees, away from the curb,
when the time comes to construct such.
Mr. Janku was concerned about the parking lot serving the
church on the northwest corner of Sexton and Mikel. Mr. Evans said the parking
lot is on the south side. He pointed out there is a small portion of the lot,
once it is constructed, that will be on Mikel Street. Mr. Evans indicated he
would assume the responsibility for constructing that portion of sidewalk as
well. Mr. Janku did not oppose the variance for sidewalks on Ridgeway and Sexton
at the current time, but he expressed concern about the location of the church
and the need for sidewalks in this area. He thought it made sense to have a sidewalk
there and believed it should be built now.
Mr. Campbell thought the issue is whether or not the sidewalk
could be built at the present time before the street is reconstructed -- without
doing the job twice. He said if the sidewalk is built back beyond the trees,
he thought it probably could be done, but it would still be "iffy". Mr. Janku
pointed out that the street is curbed now. He said maybe they could come up with
an alternative path that would be less intrusive.
Mr. Campbell made the motion that the exemption for Mikel
Street be struck from the bill with the understanding that Mr. Evans would be
allowed to build to a standard that would allow him to save the trees. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Janku and approved unanimously by voice vote.
Mr. John asked if the street is scheduled to be rebuilt in
anyway that would make aligning a sidewalk redundant because it would have to
be realigned later. Mr. Patterson said there is nothing in the CIP for the reconstruction
of Mikel Street at this particular location. He explained it is already an improved
street and he thought what was being referred to was the unimproved portion over
to the west. Mr. Patterson said the City would construct a sidewalk when that
portion of Mikel Street is improved. He noted since this is a residential street,
the work would be tax billed under normal City policies. Mr. Patterson spoke
to the subject of the applicant's desire to construct his portion of the sidewalk
behind the trees. He stated that regardless of good intentions, the plat does
not have right-of-way for it and at some time in the future that option may not
exist, unless it is addressed now. He said if the variance is denied, the property
owner has an opportunity to enter into an agreement that would be binding.
Mr. John asked if Mr. Evans would have to come back in at
a later date with alternative sidewalk plans that would identify how the walk
would be built and maintained, and whether a right of use permit would be needed.
Mr. Patterson said either that, or in three years a sidewalk would have to be
built. He said this would give the applicant time to address those issues.
B412-00, as amended, was given third reading with the vote
recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CRAYTON, JANKU, CROCKETT, CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN,
HINDMAN. VOTING NO: NO ONE. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:
B415-00 Eliminating the Risk Management
Advisory Committee.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained that the role of this committee and its
possible elimination was discussed during this year's Council retreat.
B415-00 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CRAYTON, JANKU, CROCKETT, CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN.
VOTING NO: NO ONE. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:
B416-00 Approving the final plat of
Bearfield Meadows; authorizing a development agreement and a
performance
contract.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained that this major subdivision contains approximately
35 acres with 133 lots. He said it had been recommended for approval with various
conditions stipulated in a development agreement.
Mr. Patterson summarized the necessity of the development
agreement was to assure that impervious area limitations will not be exceeded.
It is staff's recommendation that the City reserve the development rights on
five lots until such time the others are all occupied and then there can be a
determination of what the conditions are on the total site. He believed the developer
concurred with this recommendation.
Mr. Patterson indicated the two basic areas of disagreement
between staff and the developer pertains to the City's requirement that the site
plan be sealed by a licensed professional engineer, and the issue of drainage
easements and fences. His understanding is that the developer is unwilling to
accept either of those conditions. Mr. Patterson believed a sealed site plan
is important to verify that accurate monitoring of the property is being conducted.
He said without the sealed plan this would be difficult at best. Since the agreement
calls for a professional engineer to certify the amount of impervious areas after
construction, Mr. Patterson indicated that staff thought it would be preferable
to have an engineer document this from the beginning for verification purposes.
He stated it will not duplicate or double costs to do so. Mr. Patterson reiterated
the sensitivity of the area and he thought there would be very high public expectation
for the conditions to be adhered to.
Mr. Patterson reported the other difference of opinion relates
to drainage easements and fences. He explained the development agreement prohibits
obstruction to water drainage in such an easement. He noted fences were specifically
identified because that was one of the major problems staff found to exist in
The Hamlet Subdivision. The agreement does not prohibit fences, rather the property
owner would have to receive approval from the City before they can be erected.
Other than those two issues, Mr. Patterson believed the rest of the agreement
had been deemed acceptable.
Don Stohldrier, 4016 Glen Eagle, property developer, said
he would not refuse to sign the agreement at this point, but thought some of
the requirements seemed like a duplication of expense. He thought enough restrictions
are already being imposed on the property owners at this point. Mr. Stohldrier
distributed to the Council a copy of a sealed plot plan. He said the basic information
contained within this plan would show the dimensions of the home, driveway and
the impervious surfaces on the lot. This is something he would submit in order
to obtain a building permit in Columbia. Mr. Stohldrier pointed out the only
difference is that the impervious calculations are listed. He believed anyone
can do this and he did not see the point for him to go to his engineer and pick
up a survey only to have them draw the calculations on it. Mr. Stohldrier stated
the sealed plot plan in no way guarantees or assures what will be built on the
property. He said the assurance is when an engineer goes and verifies the work
when it is finished. Mr. Stohldrier remarked the elevations Mr. Patterson wants
to see identified are already on the plat.
Regarding the fences, Mr. Stohldrier reported there are easements
between every house, side yard, and back yard. He thought the reason staff wants
to approve the fences is so that they are not put in the easements. Mr. Stohldrier's
concern is that if fences are not allowed in the easements, this will create
paths and alleyways between the fences. He could see residents arguing about
who is going to maintain what. Mr. Stohldrier thought it would be very simple
to construct a fence that would not obstruct water.
Mrs. Crockett asked Mr. Patterson if he was asking this developer
to do anything different then staff would require when a home is constructed
in a flood plain and the plot plan has to be certified by an engineer. Mr. Patterson
replied that actually, probably less than that. He added that what Mr. Stohldrier
says he will do, does not represent what the purchaser of the lot may do. He
said the real need is not so much at the end, as it is the process from the issuance
of the permit to the end. As disputes arise, which he believed certainly will,
Mr. Patterson thought it was important for staff to have a very clear intent
at the time the permit is issued. With regard to fences, he said the drainage
through this area is critical and staff wanted to stress the importance that
permission must be obtained before a homeowner can erect fences in the drainage
ways. Mr. Patterson indicated that staff is not necessarily prohibiting such,
but they are emphasizing the need for some control over it.
Mr. Coffman asked if there was the possibility of ending up
with fences on each side of an easement with the end result being more fences
than there would be if people just put fences between the houses. He wondered
if this could impact storm water in a negative way. Mr. Patterson did not think
this would happen. If staff denies any fence requests, it would have to be for
a good reason. He said the end result will not be a series of corridors through
the neighborhood. Mr. Coffman asked how the staff arrived at five lots. Mr. Patterson
responded that staff and the developer had mutually agreed that was a reasonable
number. Mr. Coffman indicated he could support the bill the way it was presented.
Mr. John noted mention was made of floor elevations being
on the plan. He did not think most builders are required to identify such when
applying for a building permit. Mr. Patterson replied in this situation the elevation
is critical and staff believes it is important to have it verified and certified
on each lot so they can determine it is in conformance with the plat. Mr. John
asked if this condition is unique in Columbia to this development. Mr. Patterson
said it was, and he added that there are many conditions being imposed on this
development that are unique. Mr. John commented the point is that the developer
may realize what it is he needs to do, but he will probably sell groups of lots
to builders, who may in turn farm a few of those off to other builders who have
not been a part of this process. He said the City has an opportunity to do this
right or forever be second guessed. Mr. John agreed the conditions would be an
imposition, but not a great one.
B416-00 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CRAYTON, JANKU, CROCKETT, CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN.
VOTING NO: NO ONE. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:
CONSENT AGENDA
The following bills were given second reading and the resolutions
were read by the Clerk.
B403-00 Accepting easements for electric
and water purposes.
B406-00 Accepting easements for drainage,
sewer, street and utility purposes.
B407-00 Approving the engineer's final
report for the Hinkson Creek Trail Phase 1 Project.
B408-00 Authorizing Change Order No.
1; approving the engineer's final report for construction of the North
Parklawn
Court Drainage Project.
B409-00 Authorizing Change Order No.
1; approving the engineer's final report for construction of the
Providence
Road Sidewalk Project.
B410-00 Approving right of use permits
authorizing the University of Missouri to perform utility work within
City
rights-of-way.
B414-00 Vacating a portion of a sewer
right-of-way located across Lot 11 of Fellows Subdivision.
R244-00 Setting a public hearing: special
assessments against property benefitted by improvements
made
to Sanitary Sewer District No. 155, Marion Drive and Medavista Drive.
R245-00 Setting a public hearing: voluntary
annexation of property located north of Mexico Gravel Road,
east
of Benedict Road.
R246-00 Setting a public hearing: voluntary
annexation of property located on the south side of Old Plank
Road,
across from Tessa Way.
R247-00 Setting a public hearing: construction
of water mains along Fairview Road and Worley Street.
R248-00 Authorizing dissolution of Southmark
Development, Inc.
B249-00 Renewing an agreement with the
Missouri Department of Corrections for tuberculosis skin tests
and
Hepatitis B and flu vaccines.
The bills were given third reading and the resolutions
were read with the vote recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CRAYTON, JANKU,
CROCKETT, CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN. VOTING NO: NO ONE. Bills declared
enacted and resolutions declared adopted, reading as follows:
NEW BUSINESS
R250-00 Authorizing FY 2001 social service
contracts.
The resolution was read by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained that the Commission's recommendations were
discussed during the budget process. This would authorize 40 program services
provided by 27 local agencies. In addition, vendor contract funding has been
recommended for child care services and homemaker/personal care services administered
through the Office of Community Services. Mr. Beck reported the Health Department
will also receive funding. Total social service funding for FY 2001 is $760,300.
Mr. Janku pointed out that the recommendations are made after
the Commission has gone through a thorough public hearing process.
The vote on R250-00 was recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CRAYTON,
JANKU, CROCKETT, CAMPBELL, JOHN, COFFMAN, HINDMAN. VOTING NO: NO ONE. Resolution
declared adopted, reading as follows:
The following bills were introduced by the Mayor, unless otherwise indicated, and all were given first reading:
B417-00 Approving a revision to the
Columbia Mall C-P Development Plan.
B418-00 Approving the Boone Hospital
Medical Park - Phase 3 O-P Development Plan.
B419-00 Approving the Boone County Fire
Protection District - Station 14 C-P Development Plan.
B420-00 Rezoning property located north
and west of the northwest corner of North College Avenue and
Smith
Street from District R-3 to District O-1.
B421-00 Approving the final plat of
Columbia Recreation Center.
B422-00 Approving the final plat of
Alsberge Subdivision; authorizing a performance contract.
B423-00 Approving the final plat of
Thornbrook, Plat No. 6; authorizing a performance contract.
B424-00 Changing the street name "Heriford
Drive" to "Heriford Road" within West Vandiver Industrial
Park,
Plat 1.
B425-00 Voluntary annexation of property
located on the northeast corner of State Route WW and Rustic
Road;
establishing permanent zoning.
B426-00 Authorizing a right of use agreement
with Boone County Regional Sewer District to install sewer line
along
Lake of the Woods Recreation Area.
B427-00 Authorizing an agreement with
the Missouri Department of Public Safety for a Delinquency and
Youth
Violence Prevention Program Grant; appropriating funds.
B428-00 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
District No. 152 along Spring Valley Road immediately south of West
Broadway.
B429-00 Authorizing acquisition of easements
for the construction of the 80-acre point sewer serving
Evergreen
Acres Subdivision.
B430-00 Amending Chapter 14 of the Code
to establish speed limits at Columbia Regional Airport.
B431-00 Amending Chapter 14 of the Code
to prohibit parking on portions of Proctor Drive.
B432-00 Amending Chapter 22 of the Code
relating to sanitary sewer use.
B433-00 Amending Chapter 22 of the Code
relating to tax bills for sanitary sewer projects.
B434-00 Approving change orders to the
contract with Phillips Grading & Construction, Inc. for construction
of
Wetland Treatment Unit #4.
B435-00 Approving the engineer's final
report; accepting a deed of dedication; authorizing payment of
differential
costs for water main construction serving Spring Creek, Plat 1.
B436-00 Accepting easements for utility
purposes.
B437-00 Authorizing construction of
water mains along Fairview Road and Worley Street.
B438-00 Levying and assessing tax for
abatement of a weed nuisance for property located at 1905 Newton
Drive.
B439-00 Authorizing a lease agreement
with the Callaway County Tourism Board, Inc.; appropriating funds.
REPORTS AND PETITIONS
(A) Stephens Lake & Russell Property
Master Plans
Mr. Beck explained that he and Mr. Hood discussed the need
for providing three plans to the Council; one being an update of the needs assessment
portion of the City's 1994 Master Plan, and then development plans for the Stephens
Lake and Russell properties. The staff recommendation is that a consultant be
hired to work with the planning staff and any additional committee the Council
might appoint. Mr. Beck reported the consultant would make recommendations to
the Parks and Recreation Commission. After the Commission has had an opportunity
to review the recommendations, the proposal would be submitted to the Council.
He said there would be opportunities for public input through the entire process.
Earlier this evening, Mr. Beck indicated the Council asked that he look into
providing extra staff to do the necessary work rather than hire a consultant.
Mr. Hood said he would bring back some additional information
in regards to this request.
Mrs. Crockett commented there is not anyone who knows the
parks system any better than the existing City employees who are doing a fantastic
job. With the $60,000 budgeted to update the plan, she thought two additional
people could be hired which would enable Mr. Hood and Mr. Griggs to work on the
plan.
Mr. Janku commented that possibly the best thing the City
has done in recent history, park-wise, was the skateboard park. He said the parks
staff had gotten input from the kids that were going to use it. Mr. Janku was
hopeful staff would do the same thing with these two parks. Mr. Hood assured
the Council that staff would arrange meetings with different interest groups,
and they would certainly make an effort to bring the young people into the planning
on both parks.
(B) Intra-Departmental Transfer of
Funds
Report accepted.
(C) Proposed Revisions to the Zoning
Ordinance Regarding Homeless Shelters
Mr. Beck explained that this question had come about in relation
to the Salvation Army's proposal to expand their existing building on Ann Street.
Mr. Campbell made the motion that the issue be referred to
the Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation to the Council. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Janku and approved unanimously by voice vote.
(D) Potential Sanitary Sewer District
at Rollins Road and Burnam Avenue
Mr. Beck noted that this District would correct some existing
sewer problems in this older area of the City.
Mr. John made the motion that the staff be directed to proceed.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Campbell and approved unanimously by voice vote.
(E) Draft Legislative Priorities -
2001 Session
Mr. Beck noted that many items on the list come from those
adopted by the Missouri Municipal League wherein cities throughout the state
had various committees working on different issues that have come before the
government. He said the next step would be to prepare a resolution if the Council
wants to move forward with all or part of the list.
Mr. Janku remarked that frequently the larger urban areas
have enacted legislation pertaining to the older parts of their communities (redevelopment),
and sometimes they are able to narrow the legislation so that it only targets
their city. He thought Columbia should be looking for opportunities to participate
when those types of bills come forward.
Ms. Crayton said there are a lot of bills we could probably "piggy-back" on.
Mayor Hindman suggested that the Council have more regular
contact with the City's lobbyist because he would be more familiar with what
is going on in the legislature. He said the Council has no way of knowing what
might come up that could be beneficial to Columbia. Mayor Hindman thought staff
should be urged to stay in contact with the lobbyist who could watch for bills
that would benefit Columbia.
Mr. Janku indicated his support for the lobbyist to focus
on economic redevelopment and other similar issues.
Mr. John asked if they could meet with the lobbyist at a pre-Council
dinner meeting so he could hear the Council's thoughts on what kinds of things
they are looking for. He thought it would be a good idea to do that a couple
of times during the year, something separate from the breakfast with the legislators.
The Council decided to defer the list for the present time,
and staff would try to schedule the lobbyist to attend the January 2, 2001, pre-Council
dinner.
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Upon receiving the majority vote of the Council, the following
individuals were appointed to the following boards and commissions:
BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION
Lee, Sharon, Y., 106 McBaine, Ward 1 - term to expire 7/31/02
COMMUNITY SERVICES ADVISORY COMMISSION
Kinsey, Reginald A., 312 Defoe, Ward 4 - term to expire 12/31/03
Rittner, Renee B., 2716 Cimarron, Ward 5 - term to expire 12/31/03
INTERNET CITIZENS ADVISORY GROUP
Robertson, Michael C., 108 W. Forest, Ward 1 - term to expire 10/15/02
POLICE RETIREMENT BOARD
Harper, Milt, 1004 LaGrange, Ward 5 - term to expire 12/31/02
SPECIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
Kabler, Kary, 509 Westmount, Ward 4 - term to expire 1/1/04
Roper, Robert L., 3711 Woodrail-on-the-Green, Ward 5 - term to expire 1/1/04
Walther, Skip, 2209 Yuma, Ward 4 - term to expire 1/1/04
COMMENTS OF COUNCIL, STAFF, AND PUBLIC
Mr. Janku asked for an update on the budget billing program
related to utilities.
Mr. Janku noted that the sidewalk project had been completed
on Providence Road north of I-70. He asked if the landscaping plans were about
to come forward. Mr. Patterson spoke about the goal for spring planting. He will
submit an updated report to the Council.
Ms. Crayton asked if the City has a cold weather rule. Mr.
Boeckmann explained that the state law does not apply to us, but added that we
have a similar policy. Mr. Coffman thought this would be a good time to make
the policy available to the Council and to the press. He also suggested reminders
to people about the utility assistance programs. Mr. Beck said he would get a
report back to the Council.
Ms. Crayton spoke about two new houses that were built on
Worley and Pendleton. She said they have been vacant for a long time and wondered
if they were priced out of range. She asked if that was contrary to HUD's expectations.
Mr. Coffman noted that staff was responding to concerns about
the crosswalk at MOREnet on LeMone Boulevard by suggesting that it be repainted
to make it more visible. The stripes will be increased from four inches to twelve
inches. He said it will be monitored for awhile and if the crosswalk does not
work, the City will consider some other improvements like bulb-outs or a median.
Mr. Coffman asked if the painting would be done as soon as weather permits it.
Mr. Patterson verified that it would be.
Mayor Hindman indicated that he has been receiving numerous
complaints regarding the lack of snow removal on sidewalks. He asked that last
year's staff report be resubmitted for Council review. He said there are a large
number of people who do not shovel their walks because they are physically unable
to do so. A suggestion made last year was that a clearinghouse be made available
where people can call in and the City would be able to respond with company names
or people who provide snow removal services. Mayor Hindman said if there is such
a clearinghouse in operation, he was fairly confident that very few people know
anything about it.
Mr. Campbell noted there are a number of apartment complexes
and fraternities on Stewart Road, between Garth and Providence. He reported there
are many students who live in this area, but the walks are not being cleared.
For areas such as that, he thought with a little prodding by the City it could
be taken care of.
Mayor Hindman commented that he also received an inquiry about
snow routes. He said although the City does not have them, we do have a priority
system. As Columbia continues to grow, he thought we might need to consider establishing
snow routes.
Regarding the sidewalks and speed bumps in the First Ward,
Mayor Hindman asked staff to respond to the situation brought up at the beginning
of the meeting. Mr. Patterson noted that staff has done a sidewalk survey through
the entire area. He said they had preliminary costs on it, but he was not sure
that staff had been directed to proceed with implementation at this point. Mr.
Janku was hopeful they could proceed with some of the work this year. He pointed
out that the CDBG Commission did not want to allocate funding to these types
of projects because they did not know where the money would be spent. Mr. Patterson
remarked that he has all the data.
Mr. Beck reported that the bid opening date for the community
recreation center is being changed to January 4, 2001. He said a notice would
be sent to the bidders.
Norman Lenhardt, 1118 St. Christopher, noted the discussion
earlier about park planning and hiring a consultant. He thought that was a good
idea; however, the Council is overlooking the fact that all of these projects
are being paid for with sales tax monies. He wanted to see user fees charged
to new people coming into the City so the funding for these projects could be
obtained in advance. Mr. Lenhardt observed that poor people use the facilities
the least but are being charged the most.
Karl Skala, 5201 Gasconade, said the Planning and Zoning Commission
was awaiting the Council's direction to review the issue of street widths. Regarding
snow removal, Mr. Skala said his neighborhood association is trying to encourage
the youth in their neighborhood to shovel walks for those who cannot do their
own. He said it would be funded by the homeowners association. He reminded the
Council that the Energy and Environment Commission was awaiting a response on
their last draft of the outdoor lighting report. Mr. Skala indicated the Commission
would be happy to work with the Council in any way.
Mr. Coffman asked where the Council was on the lighting issue.
Mayor Hindman responded that they have not gotten a chance to review it as of
yet. Mr. Coffman suggested the Council could consider some of the larger revisions
for now. He thought the staff could prioritize the issues so they would not be
taking it on all at once.
William Woodward, 200A Unity, suggested that people who perform
community service might be able to assist in snow removal. He mentioned a snow
removal program through the Voluntary Action Center. Mr. Woodward noted that
litter containers are needed at some of the City's bus stops. He also thanked
anyone who was involved in correcting the situation at the Mall entrance on Worley.
Regarding snow routes, Mr. Woodward asked that bus routes be made a priority.
The meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Penny
St. Romaine
City
Clerk
© 2024 City of Columbia