INTRODUCTORY
The City Council of the City of Columbia, Missouri, met for
a regular meeting at 7:00 p.m., on Monday, July 20, 1998, in the Council Chamber
of the City of Columbia, Missouri. The roll was taken with the following
results: Council members CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, JANKU, CROCKETT. Council
member COBLE was absent. The City Manager, City Counselor, City Clerk,
and various Department Heads were also present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of July 6, 1998, were approved
unanimously by voice vote on a motion made by Mr. Campbell and a second by Mr.
Janku.
APPROVAL AND ADJUSTMENT OF AGENDA INCLUDING CONSENT AGENDA
The agenda, including the Consent Agenda, was approved unanimously
by voice vote on a motion made by Mr. Janku and a second by Mr. Campbell.
SPECIAL ITEMS
None.
SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
B194-98 Authorizing the repair and stabilization
of a section of the streambank of Bear Creek between Garth
Avenue
and Creasy Springs Road; appropriating funds.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained repairs would occur in a 200 foot portion
of the streambank located in north central Columbia, in the area that was once
the City's sewage lagoon. The work, planned to be executed by City forces,
is estimated at a cost of $18,000.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
There being no comment, Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
B194-98 was given third reading with the vote recorded as follows: VOTING
YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, JANKU, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO
ONE. ABSENT: COBLE. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:
B202-98 Rezoning property located on the northeast
corner of Austin Avenue and Grand Avenue from C-1 to
C-3.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck said that some proposed changes to the rezoning request
had been received today and were distributed to the Council this evening. He
asked Mr. Boeckmann to explained the proposal.
Mr. Boeckmann explained that the request had changed from
a C-3 zoning to a C-P on the two lots. The proposed uses would include
all C-1 uses, and a wholesale and retail sales office, sample room, and facility
for the indoor storage and delivery of beauty products. He said the land
use plan would be changed to planned commercial. Mr. Boeckmann explained
that a condition of the rezoning would be that no change shall be made in the
use of the property and no improvements, other than remodeling, shall be constructed
on the property until the City Council has approved a C-P development plan for
the property. Mr. Boeckmann noted that when he was working on the amendment
sheet, he also thought there would be a change in the legal description, but
there is not. He said the portion on the amendment sheet that reads, "Section
One is amended to delete the legal description of lot___", should not be part
of the amendment.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
Tom Schneider, an attorney with offices at 11 N. Seventh,
spoke on behalf of the contract purchasers. He said the Weaver's have operated
Tiger Beauty Supply on Lakeview for years, and the business needs are such that
they need to expand. That is the reason they are interested in purchasing
the old Cal-Type building on Austin Avenue. Because there would be some
storage and delivery, Mr. Schneider said there is a necessity for zoning over
and above C-1. Mr. Schneider explained the two changes to the rezoning
request which includes the deletion of the corner lot from the application, and
a request for C-P rather than C-3 zoning. He noted that the change to C-P
was made in order to conform to the desires of the neighborhood association. He
said the Weaver's met with the association, and they had voted unanimously to
support a C-P proposal. Mr. Schneider pointed out there was no objection
to Tiger Beauty Supply, the neighborhood just preferred the planned commercial
zoning designation. Mr. Schneider noted that the nature of the business
would create very little traffic, less than what a C-1 use would generate at
that location.
Pat Kelly, 1007 Grand Avenue, President of the Ridgeway Neighborhood
Association, said the association met with Mr. Weaver and had decided they were
not opposed to his business as a neighbor, but objected to the C-3 zoning request. She
asked the Council to support the C-P designation.
John Clark, 403 N. Ninth, President of the neighborhood association
immediately adjacent to the Ridgeway Neighborhood Association, spoke in support
of this particular project and the C-P request.
Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
Mr. Janku made the motion that B202-98 be amended per the
amendment sheet, with the exception of the language regarding a lot being excluded. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Campbell and approved unanimously by voice vote.
B202-98, as amended, was given third reading with the vote
recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN,
JANKU, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: COBLE. Bill
declared enacted, reading as follows:
B203-98 Amending Chapter 29 of the Code to
allow day care centers and similar establishments in District R-2
as
conditional uses.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck noted an increasing demand for day care facilities
in the community. From time to time, facilities have been requested in
R-2 areas of the City. Mr. Beck reported when one such request was reviewed
by the Board of Adjustment, there had been no opposition. He explained
that the Council had directed the Planning and Zoning Commission to hold a public
hearing regarding the issue. The Commission's recommendation was to allow
day care facilities in R-2 districts provided a conditional use permit is obtained.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
There being no comment, Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
B203-98 was given third reading with the vote recorded as follows: VOTING
YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, JANKU, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO
ONE. ABSENT: COBLE. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:
(A) Improvements at the intersections of Nifong
Boulevard and Bethel Street and Nifong Boulevard and Forum
Boulevard.
Item A was read by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck noted that this project had been discussed for the
last few years in the capital improvement program. He said various alternatives
have been examined, and he asked Mr. Patterson to describe them.
Mr. Patterson explained that the staff had submitted a report
approximately one year ago on the intersections, and the Council had requested
that the staff further investigate some alternatives that might be more aesthetic
and perhaps more pedestrian friendly to the area. He said they were specifically
asked to look into the possibility of roundabouts at the two locations. At
that time, a detailed analysis of traffic counts, accidents, and research into
the use of roundabouts had been done. Mr. Patterson reported as a result
of that study, staff recommended that roundabouts not be applied at these locations
due to existing and future traffic volumes. He said the roundabouts would
require two lanes of traffic and are considered to be more of a pedestrian hazard,
particularly at the Bethel intersection where one of the major purposes is to
provide protection for children crossing the street. In addition, the roundabouts
would require quite a bit more property (which is very expensive to acquire),
increasing the total cost of the project significantly more than the traffic
signals.
Mr. Patterson said staff had also looked at alternatives for
the more conventional signalized intersections to incorporate pedestrian and
bicycle features for enhancement of alternative transportation modes. The
estimates arrived at for construction of the alternatives indicated that bicycle
lanes could be constructed at an expense of about $93,000 above the cost for
just the pedestrian signal intersections. Mr. Patterson reported staff
recommended construction of just the signalized intersections.
Mr. Patterson stated that at Forum and Nifong, staff recommends
construction of pedestrian islands and crossings with pedestrian actuated signal
heads. He noted the islands would provide some protection at this location,
and a pedestrian would not have to cross more than three lanes of traffic. At
none of the intersections is staff recommending designated bicycle lanes through
the intersections, not only due to the cost involved, but also because of the
fact that it simply widens the intersection and makes it less pedestrian accessible.
In regards to landscaping, Mr. Patterson said three of the
islands have about 30 square feet that can be landscaped -- although it would
be very expensive. He noted the island in the southeast corner would be
too small and crowded to accommodate any type of landscaping.
Mr. Patterson reported at the Bethel intersection, staff recommends
pedestrian actuated signals with marked crosswalks. Also being recommended
is a free right turn due to the heavy traffic movements north to east on Nifong,
which would provide opportunities for a landscaped island of some size in the
southeast corner. Mr. Patterson said there would be some modifications
to existing sidewalks in order to assure pedestrian landings at each of the corners.
The total project cost is estimated to be about $380,000,
which would be paid for out of sales tax funds, the CIP programming for traffic
safety and annual streets, and other funds that may be appropriate.
Mr. Campbell asked if right turn lanes would be installed
at all of the corners. Mr. Patterson said at this time only a free right
on Bethel is shown. He said the other turning movements do not warrant
such at this time. Mr. Patterson said as traffic grows, the areas designated
as crosswalks will be the location of future islands as right turn lanes are
constructed. Mr. Campbell said he wanted to be assured that enough space
was being reserved. Mr. Patterson said five lanes are projected at that
intersection, and an area is being reserved for that purpose. He said staff
is trying to minimize the cost of the project at this point.
Mr. Janku asked if the right turn had been designed yet. He
understood a particular design could be utilized that would tend to slow down
cars to give pedestrians more time to cross. Mr. Patterson said if a problem
is observed, a raised crosswalk would probably lend itself well as a way to do
that.
Mayor Hindman asked about the big expense for landscaping. Mr.
Patterson explained that the big expense is for installing water lines under
the pavement. He said if water is not put in, there is not a great deal
of cost. The people responsible for maintenance generally prefers to have
water at the island so as not to have a truck or a person exposed to traffic. Mayor
Hindman asked about planting zeroscape where water is not needed. Mr. Patterson
said if staff works with the Parks and Recreation Department on designing something
where water would not be needed, the cost of landscaping would be pretty minimal. Mayor
Hindman asked that staff look into that possibility. Whenever putting in
new islands, he felt the City should think seriously about making that a policy. Mayor
Hindman said the zeroscape may not be as colorful, but it would be a lot better
than concrete. Mr. Kruse noted that these plantings could be very colorful
if done correctly. He agreed something should be done at this location.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
Rob Meyers, 3905 West Oak Drive, explained that both his home
and office are located just off of Nifong Boulevard. He travels through
the intersections several times a day and had been observing the traffic patterns. On
Nifong and Bethel, he noted that the traffic flow is pretty much east/west --
with some exceptions. He said there is a dramatically different pattern
when traveling down to Forum, with a lot of people turning left. He was
supportive of the intersection at Bethel and Nifong, but not Forum and Nifong. He
said the traffic moves through the intersection very smoothly at this time, both
during rush hour and at other times of the day as well. He felt a signal
would impede traffic flow as it tries to accommodate all of the left turn movements. Mr.
Meyers felt it would be best to leave this intersection as a four way stop.
Mayor Hindman explained that traffic was found to be increasing
at this located by 7% per year. He said the reason for the improvements
was based on the projected traffic.
Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
Mr. Kruse agreed that the traffic flow through the intersection
at Nifong and Forum is certainly much easier to negotiate. He asked Mr.
Patterson to address that point.
Mr. Patterson said that Mr. Meyers is correct, there is a
difference in the traffic movements at the two intersections. Currently
at Forum and Nifong, he said traffic counts are about the same -- in the neighborhood
of 10,000-11,000 vehicles per day. He noted the intersection does meet
standard warrants for a traffic signal even at this point. Whereas, at
Bethel and Nifong, Mr. Patterson said it is about two to one -- east/west, north/south. He
said when talking about the free rights on Bethel earlier, perhaps it had not
been emphasized that the Forum intersection would also contain free right turns
on the corners. He said there would be left turn signals at those locations
also, so there will be a way of assuring smooth traffic flow through the intersection.
Mr. Campbell asked if those signals will be traffic activated. Mr.
Patterson said there had been no decision made, but it would be advantageous
to have progression through the two signals.
Mr. Kruse asked about the benefit of doing both intersections
at the same time. Mr. Patterson said there would be likely cost savings
in having the work done under one contract and having both done at the same time. He
said there would be less extended disruption in the area as well.
Mayor Hindman asked if the City already has the right-of-way
needed for this improvement. Mr. Patterson said nearly all of it has been
obtained, but there is another small segment at the northwest corner of Forum
that has to be acquired in order to construct the free right turn lane. He
said the right-of-way at the southeast corner of Bethel will also be needed. Mr.
Patterson said staff has already been in contact with the developer, and he is
aware of what would be needed.
Mr. Kruse noted that the property on the southeast corner
at Nifong and Forum is already appropriately zoned for development. He
said it is owned by Boone Hospital Center and he assumed medical offices will
be developed on this site over time. At the other intersection, on the
southeast corner, he pointed out that grading has recently occurred and a lot
of trees have been removed. He asked if building permits had been issued. Mr.
Patterson said there have been no plans submitted other than the grading plan
and land disturbance plan. Mr. Kruse guessed it could also be assumed something
will be constructed soon or the developer would not have gone to all of the expense
he had.
Mr. Kruse said he had asked for the consideration of the roundabouts,
and he thought the report was very good and provided excellent groundwork for
future consideration of other roundabout locations. He appreciated the
very thorough report and thanked the staff for all of the work they had put into
it. He accepted their conclusion and felt the reasoning was sound. Regarding
the proposal to not extend the bike lanes, he agreed there probably is a safety
issue with putting the lanes through, and concurred the lanes should not be installed. Mr.
Kruse felt staff was a little premature regarding the signalization on the Forum
and Nifong intersection, but he is comfortable this work should be done because
it will have to occur at some point in the next few years anyway. Mr. Kruse
thought staff should proceed with the project.
Mr. Kruse made the motion that staff be directed to proceed
with final plans and specification for each intersection. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Janku and approved unanimously by voice vote.
(B) Construction of sidewalks and sidewalk
ramps along a portion of West Ash Street.
Item B was read by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained that this would authorize a sidewalk along
the north side of West Ash (from West Boulevard to Pershing), and the south side
of West Ash (from Pershing west to Clinkscales), at an estimated cost of $75,000. He
understood that the staff had met with the property owners.
Mr. Patterson said staff had a formal meeting with the property
owners and also individual contacts. He noted this project had been initiated
by Councilperson Coble. Mr. Patterson explained that staff had attempted
to design a sidewalk along the south side of the street in order to have a continuous
walkway. He said that had been met by considerable opposition by some of
the property owners. As a result, staff came back with a redesign and a
recommendation that the City improve the existing sidewalk on the north side,
build a sidewalk where there is none on the north side between West Boulevard
and Pershing, then have a marked crossing at Pershing and build the sidewalk
the rest of the way on the south side. He said that seemed to be suitable
to most of the property owners. Mr. Patterson said he had not heard any
negative responses to the proposal. He said the sidewalk is proposed to
be the standard four foot width, but since the meeting a couple of weeks ago,
staff looked to see what it would take to add another foot. He said this
involves more utility relocation costs and additional construction easements. Mr.
Patterson reported staff recommends to proceed with the project as it has advanced
this far, before looking at changing sidewalk widths.
Mayor Hindman opened the public hearing.
There being no comment, Mayor Hindman closed the public hearing.
Mr. Janku wondered if there were plans for relocating some
of the utilities in the near future. He said that might mitigate some of
the extra cost mentioned. He asked which department picks up the cost of
the relocation. Mr. Patterson explained utility relocation costs are charged
to the department that owns the easement.
Mr. Campbell made the motion that staff be directed to proceed
with the project. The motion was seconded by Mr. Janku and approved unanimously
by voice vote.
OLD BUSINESS
B195-98 Amending Chapter 14 of the Code to
make Buttonwood Drive, south of Nifong Boulevard, a one-way
street.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck said the State Department of Transportation has requested
that Buttonwood be made a one-way street while they install a temporary signal. By
the year 2000, the State is hopeful that Route AC would be under construction
and this can be reviewed again for use as a two-way street. Mr. Beck said
staff is recommending approval of the request.
B195-98 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, JANKU, CROCKETT. VOTING
NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: COBLE. Bill declared enacted, reading
as follows:
B197-98 Amending Chapter 22 of the Code to
add a new section pertaining to deferred tax bills for sanitary
sewer
projects.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck noted that this has been a troublesome issue where
there are large tracts of undeveloped ground and sewer tax bill districts are
set up. He said the tax bills are high and opposed by the people that are
not ready to develop their property. After some public work sessions, the
Council asked staff to prepare an ordinance to deal with that question. On
undeveloped tracts of land, Mr. Beck explained that the payment of those costs
over and above 30 cents per foot, or $5,000, would be deferred until such time
that the tract is subdivided or developed. He said they had discussed large
tracts of land that the City subsidizes that may never be developed, and staff
had come to the conclusion that the ordinance should be adopted as is. Then,
prior to the time there are requests for areas with major tracts that may not
be developed in the future, staff could look into a proposed amendment that would
address the concern of these tracts.
Mr. Janku asked about the use of the term "shall" in the language. Mr.
Beck said staff had discussed "shall" versus "may". He said it is not a
clear policy to explain to people interested in setting up districts. He
said they would not know exactly what to anticipate nor would the staff know
what to tell them. Mr. Beck said if some more detailed guidelines could
be written to make it clear to anyone raising questions about how the tax bills
would have to be paid, it would be clear to everyone. He said the word "may" would
leave people in limbo.
B197-98 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, JANKU, CROCKETT. VOTING
NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: COBLE. Bill declared enacted, reading
as follows:
B200-98 Confirming the contract for the construction
of a water main along Clark Lane.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck noted that the Council had been sent a detailed staff
report on this issue. He explained that eight bids had been received, and
the Water and Light staff is recommending the low bid of J.C. Industries, Inc.
in the amount of $328,280.
B200-98 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, JANKU, CROCKETT. VOTING
NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: COBLE. Bill declared enacted, reading
as follows:
B201-98 Vacating utility easements and street
right-of-way for an unbuilt portion of Beach Point Drive;
accepting
conveyances.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck pointed out that the Planning and Zoning Commission
had voted 5-2 to deny the street right-of-way vacation. He said the Commission
felt the Beach Point Drive street connection is needed due to the limited access
into and out of the southwestern portion of Katy Lake Estates. Mr. Beck
explained the Commission does not make recommendations on easement vacations,
that is handled primarily by the staff. He understood there was no problem
with the utilities, only with the street right-of-way.
Mr. Hancock reported that when the preliminary plat was submitted
some years back, the staff attempted to gain a couple of connections at Beach
Point and at Cedar Crest Lane onto Scott Boulevard. This had been pursued
in order to diffuse traffic away from Grant Lane, and to provide future vehicular
and pedestrian access to Scott Boulevard when it is eventually improved. At
the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the residents of the subdivision
cited their concern about the safety of such a street intersection with Scott
Boulevard in its present condition. He said it was explained to the residents
that a street project is planned by the Public Works Department that would address
the sight distance situation. Mr. Hancock said if the Council decides the
street is not necessary, the right-of-way is still considered important by the
staff. He noted right-of-way is hard to come by and could be used for a
number of purposes.
Mr. Campbell asked if national numbers were available as to
how many homes should be allowed access onto a high speed traffic way. He
felt that only 30 or 40 homes would benefit from this connection, and wondered
if it would be better to have one or two access points onto a high speed roadway. Mr.
Hancock said he could not speak to any national standards, but staff is trying
to address the issue of establishing a couple of exits and entrances onto Scott
to try to feed the 30 or 40 lots. He said one principle that has been endeavored
around town is to have connections at various locations when collector and arterial
streets are nearby.
Mr. Janku asked where the street improvement project stood
at this point in terms of engineering and funding. Mr. Patterson explained
that the City entered into an agreement with the Boone County Commission a little
over a year ago relating to a safety project on Scott Boulevard, which encompasses
this area. A preliminary engineering report was prepared by Larkin and
Associates, the consultant for both the City and County. Based on the report,
the consultant was given notice to proceed with final plans and specifications. When
the subject of Beach Point Drive came up, Mr. Patterson said staff also directed
the consultant to specifically look at this proposed intersection as to what
could be done and what the potential hazards of an intersection would be. He
said the consultant has preliminarily indicated that there are improvements that
could be made that would certainly exceed minimum standards at this location
and provide a much safer intersection. Mr. Patterson reported the consultants
are still working on the design, and a meeting has been tentatively scheduled
in August to review the preliminary designs. He said if all issues are
ironed out at that point, final designs would be ready some time in September
or October. With regard to funding, Mr. Patterson said the city has
set aside some money for joint projects with the County. In addition, he
said about a month ago the staff was authorized to make a grant application to
the County. The application is in the amount of about $330,000, and the
City has about the same amount in the CIP. Originally, the County had put
aside a little over $600,000 for funding. Mr. Patterson said if everything
is approved, the earliest Scott Boulevard could be under construction would be
next year.
Assuming both intersections were built, Mr. Campbell asked
which would be the safest -- the one currently existing or the one being proposed. His
impression is that it still would not be a good intersection. Mr. Patterson
responded he could not answer to specifics on what currently exists except from
comments made at the Planning meeting regarding sight distance problems at that
location. That is one of the reasons they felt a second entrance would
be helpful. Mr. Patterson said any diffusion of the traffic at the intersections
would be helpful. Regarding Beach Point Drive, before the road is built
staff would have to be satisfied that it would be a safe intersection.
Mrs. Crockett asked when the improvements on Grant Lane would
be finished. Mr. Patterson is hopeful there will be a public hearing this
fall, with construction to begin next summer.
David Rogers, an attorney with offices at 813 E. Walnut, spoke
on behalf of the Katy Lake Homeowners Association. He said the association
has petitioned the Council to vacate this street. He said it is not a question
of another building lot being created, or a question of whether the developer
would save money because of it, but the residents who live in the area do not
want the street because it is unsafe and can only be made marginally safe by
significantly cutting-up the hillside. He was surprised to hear Mr. Hancock
and Mr. Patterson say they wanted to diffuse the traffic onto arterial streets
away from the collector streets that come into them. Mr. Rogers observed
in the past, he has begged to get entrances onto Nifong that were not approved. He
had been told the entrances must access the collector streets that feed into
arterial streets. Mr. Rogers said in this situation there are 200 houses
that have three entrances into a relatively quiet subdivision, and it was unlikely
there would be much more development.
Mr. Campbell explained that he had met with the neighborhood
association and, at that time, the developer had said he would not be saving
any money on the project because he would donate that amount of money to the
neighborhood association. Mr. Rogers said that was correct, the developer
was going to make a commitment of $8,000.
Don Stohldrier, subdivision developer, explained that the
homeowners had asked him to address the Council. Using the overhead, he
related how the subdivision was originally platted. Because there were
over 100 lots, the developer was required to have a second entrance to the subdivision. He
said one was platted at the Beach Point entrance, the best of the worst of what
was available at that time. He showed the layout that was submitted to
the City and approved as a preliminary plat for this area of ground. Mr.
Stohldrier said there was one additional exit shown going out to Grant Lane,
but no additional connections to Scott Boulevard at all. He said at that
time, three entrances and exits to the subdivision seemed to be sufficient. Subsequently,
Mr. Stohldrier purchased this property from Mr. Magnuson. He displayed
a drawing of the entire subdivision as it currently exists with the connection
to the north on Grant Lane. He noted an exit on Cedar Crest Boulevard to
Scott Boulevard was added with the hopes of eliminating the need for the Beach
Point exit. He said they still have the three complete streets in and out,
and assumed that would resolve any problems. Earlier this year, Mr. Stohldrier
had sent out a newsletter to the homeowners association mentioning the intention
to put the street in and finishing up the subdivision. He immediately received
a letter and a petition from the residents indicating they strongly wanted to
vacate the street. He said the residents do not want this road in their
subdivision as there are severe visibility constrictions at this location on
Scott Boulevard, and it is a horrible place to put a street. Mr. Stohldrier
said they would donate the money that would be saved on the street to the homeowners
association for park equipment for their in-subdivision park.
Mary Helen Horton, 4004 Beach Point, explained that the neighborhood
has 1 1/2 acres of common green space and lake access at the east end of Beach
Point Drive. She said the street ends at the lake and they felt it was
unique to see families and outdoor activities at this location. Ms. Horton
explained residents are trying to preserve their quiet residential area. A
direct vehicular route to the lake area off of Scott Boulevard would change that. Ms.
Horton said residents are fearful of auto accidents, of bikers being hit, of
children trying to cross the street, and they opposed the creation of a new four-way
traffic pattern. She said if the Council does not vacate the property,
the developer will begin building the entrance at once -- which means residents
would have to live with a very dangerous intersection for maybe three to five
years.
Forest Cushionoff, 4003 Bay Wood, also spoke on behalf of
the Katy Lake homeowners. He said the residents feel three access points
to be adequate. He said there is no objection to additional access, the
objection is to this particular access. He said residents are very comfortable
with a single access point onto Scott Boulevard, and the two access points onto
Grant with the assumption that this road will be improved. Mr. Cushionoff
reiterated the resident's feelings about the dangers of an access point at Beach
Point Drive. He felt the Planning and Zoning Commission was more concerned
about vacating this access at the present time since once it is vacated, it cannot
be undone. He said the residents believe that, despite whatever improvements
are made to Scott Boulevard, it would never be safe.
Mayor Hindman asked how the residents would feel about putting
this question on hold until the improvements to Scott Boulevard are made. Mr.
Cushionoff said he had reservations about the intersection ever being safe. His
concern is that if it is not vacated now, a road will be put in. He said
if the vacation is turned down, his hope would be that nothing would be done
until the improvements are made, and then the issue could be revisited as another
agenda item.
Mr. Campbell said because this property was developed as two
separate tracts, it was almost an historical accident in the way the access points
had been made. He understood Mr. Patterson to say that the development
on Scott Boulevard would be modified based upon whether or not there was an intersection. He
felt the Council would somewhat be determining by their action that the development
may occur. Mr. Campbell could not imagine exactly what this would look
like, but he thought it is fairly clear that it would require a lot of alterations
to the hillside because of the sharp grade in the area. Mr. Campbell believed
it would be very difficult to have a safe intersection, and he had not heard
any of the residents say they felt the access point should be created.
Mr. Janku could understand why the residents feel the way
they do. He said the houses that are going to be adjacent to Scott Boulevard,
immediately north of the proposed access, are not developed yet. He noted
these are the people that will eventually bear the burden of the traffic flow,
and they will be the folks coming to the Council wanting traffic safety and traffic
calming devices. Mr. Janku explained residents in similar situations in
other subdivisions are approaching him now requesting more direct access to a
collector street. He felt the Beach Point Drive access point is appropriate
and would help lessen the burden on future home owners. Mr. Janku agreed
that obviously if the improvements are not made, the Council would have another
question to address at a later point. He thought the Council should deny
the present vacation of Beach Point Drive. Mr. Janku reported one of the
toughest problems the Council has is establishing interconnections between neighborhoods
and subdivisions. He said these connections are resisted at almost every
turn in the initial stages by the developers. He thought Beach Point Drive
would be a good access point, and felt it would be well-used by the people in
the subdivision because it would provide better access to the south, and it would
lessen the burden on future residents to the north.
Mrs. Crockett asked which schools would be attended by children
from this neighborhood. The reply was Fairview, Smithton, and Hickman. Mrs.
Crockett said all of those schools are not south of this project. She said
as there would be no more development in the floodway, this development has gone
about as far as it can go.
Mrs. Crockett asked if the proposed intersection would be
almost directly across the street from Country Hill Subdivision. Mr. Patterson
said it was created to line up with the street. Mrs. Crockett said her
feeling is that the neighborhood children in Katy Lake Estates could possibly
have friends in Country Hill Subdivision, and would be crossing a very busy road
to get there. She said that is a safety concern in her estimation. She
said if the intersection is not there, the children would have to go to a better
crossing. Mrs. Crockett observed the residents want to keep their neighborhood
intact and did not want every Tom, Dick, and Harry running through it. For
that reason, she felt the entrance was not needed. Mrs. Crockett felt three
access points was plenty.
Mayor Hindman asked if it was possible to place the money
in escrow and see how the improvement project on Scott Boulevard goes. Mr.
Patterson said as far as staff is concerned that is acceptable. He said
there is no reason to say the entrance had to be constructed immediately. He
added that staff indicated at the public hearings that they would want to wait
until the design is complete before proceeding with this connection. At
that time, staff would bring a report back as to what they thought would be appropriate
for the intersection. Mr. Patterson said there are no houses at the Beach
Point Drive intersection location, and he saw no reason for the developer to
start work on it immediately. He reported staff would be willing to accept
a letter of credit, a bond, or some type of assurance that if the road is constructed,
the funding would be in place, and if it is not, the assurance could be returned.
Mr. Campbell said this proposal is strongly opposed by the
neighborhood and it would be, at best, marginal in the safety category. He
said the intersection does not follow the policy the City has had on other parts
of this outer beltway, and there would be only approximately 30 to 50 houses
that would be accessing it.
B201-98 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: HINDMAN,
JANKU. ABSENT: COBLE. Bill declared enacted, reading as follows:
B206-98 Appropriating funds for memorial trees
and benches.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained that the City has received about $4,000
in gifts, mostly for memorial and heritage trees and benches. He encouraged
anyone wanting to make a donation to the City's permanent park fund to do so. This
bill would simply appropriate the money to the proper account so staff can implement
the projects.
B206-98 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, JANKU, CROCKETT. VOTING
NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: COBLE. Bill declared enacted, reading
as follows:
B208-98 Amending the FY 1998 pay plan to change
the pay grade and titles of three positions in the Parks and
Recreation
Department.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck said after Mr. Hood's appointment as Director to
the Parks and Recreation Department, they had discussed several alternative changes
to the organization that might further streamline their operation. This
proposal would change two existing pay grades from 20 to 21, and one pay grade
would be reduced from a 20 to a 19.
B208-98 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, JANKU, CROCKETT. VOTING
NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: COBLE. Bill declared enacted, reading
as follows:
B212-98 Authorizing an agreement with Sprint
Spectrum, L.P. to lease space on the Walnut Street water tower
for
PCS antennas.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck said that criteria had been established to ensure
proper landscaping would be in place, and that the antennas would not interfere
with City operations. He said staff had worked with Sprint and arrived
at an agreement where the City would be paid $10,000 per year for a five year
period, and then Sprint would have two-five year options to continue this arrangement. Mr.
Beck said it was felt the agreement met the criteria discussed with the Council,
and it is consistent with the policy of keeping the number of towers being constructed
in the community to a minimum.
B212-98 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, JANKU, CROCKETT. VOTING
NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: COBLE. Bill declared enacted, reading
as follows:
B213-98 Establishing October 1, 1998, as the
effective date of the solid waste utility fee increases.
The bill was given second reading by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck said this bill would adopt a change in the solid
waste rates at the beginning of the City's fiscal year, October 1, 1998, and
authorizes the use of funds for this program during the current fiscal year. The
amendment changes the residential rate from $8.65 to $9.95 per month, and there
will be an approximate 5 1/2% increase to commercial users. Mr. Beck reported
the money would be used not only for the blue bag program, which is roughly 93
cents of the increase, but funds would also be used to build a new maintenance
facility at the landfill and to pay for landfill costs.
Mrs. Crockett asked if the City would proceed with the increase
even though more than half of the City will not have the blue bag system by October
1st. Mr. Beck said it would be phased in starting with the Monday route. He
said distribution of bags would begin next Monday, July 27th.
Mayor Hindman pointed out that not all of the rate increase
was associated with the blue bag system.
Mr. Coffman asked how often new routes would be added. Mr.
Patterson said every two months another route would be added.
B213-98 was given third reading with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, JANKU, CROCKETT. VOTING
NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: COBLE. Bill declared enacted, reading
as follows:
CONSENT AGENDA
The following bills were given second reading and the resolutions
were read by the Clerk.
B196-98 Appropriating funds for the rehabilitation
of the north cargo apron at Columbia Regional Airport.
B198-98 Authorizing the installation of pedestrian
safety improvements at the intersection of Tenth Street and
Rogers
Street by City employees.
B199-98 Calling for bids to construct sidewalks
along West Broadway and along Smiley Lane.
B204-98 Approving the final plat of Meadowlands
Subdivision, Plat No. 15, a major subdivision.
B205-98 Approving a replat of Lot 243 of West
Pointe, Plat 1-B-1.
B207-98 Appropriating funds for public health
and corrections nursing services.
B209-98 Authorizing a settlement agreement
with Richard C. and Nan B. Erickson: accepting conveyance.
B210-98 Authorizing right of use permit to
allow Union Electric to install and maintain a gas main across Rebel
Hills
substation property.
B211-98 Accepting conveyance for water utility
purposes from the National Benevolent Association of the
Christian
Churches.
R146-98 Setting a public hearing: street improvements
on Sunflower Street and Barberry Avenue.
R147-98 Setting a public hearing: construction
of 12" water main to serve Woodhaven Dormitory; providing
payment
for differential costs.
R148-98 Setting a public hearing: voluntary
annexation of property located north and west of State Route KK,
along
both sides of Scott Boulevard, west of the City.
R149-98 Setting a public hearing: renovations
to the police building at Walnut Street between Sixth Street and
Seventh
Street.
R150-98 Authorizing an amendment to the fiber
optic agreement with the Curators of the University of Missouri.
R151-98 Authorizing an amendment to the agreement
with the State of Missouri Department of Health.
The bills were given third reading and the resolutions were read with the vote recorded as follows: VOTING YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, JANKU, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: COBLE. Bills declared enacted and resolutions declared adopted, reading as follows:
NEW BUSINESS
R152-98 Authorizing an agreement with Classic
Balloon Events, Inc. to provide in-kind services for the US
Cellular
Balloon Classic.
The resolution was read by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck said this event would be held from August 28-30,
1998, at the Fairgrounds. He said this agreement is being brought to the
Council because staff support is requested. Mr. Beck noted it is not anticipated
the City would be committing to a very large expenditure, the agreement primarily
provides for refueling at the Fire Training facility. He said the cost
has been estimated at less than $1,000 in staff time. Proceeds from the
event will go to the Ronald McDonald House.
Janie Thomas, appeared on behalf of Classic Balloon Events,
and offered to answer any questions. She asked the Council to support the
event.
The vote on R152-98 was recorded as follows: VOTING
YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, JANKU, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO
ONE. ABSENT: COBLE. Resolution declared adopted, reading as
follows:
R153-98 Acknowledging the request of Jeffrey
E. Smith Development Company for federal HOME funds.
The resolution was read by the Clerk.
Mr. Beck explained that Mr. Smith was asking for City support
in his request of $225,000 in HOME funds for the program year 1999-2000. He
noted HOME funds are federal monies that come to the City. He said Mr.
Smith would be seeking other funds to put the total project together. Mr.
Smith proposes to build 16 duplex units for the disabled in the Hanover Boulevard
area, and had constructed similar units in the past.
Mr. Beck had asked staff to calculate the HOME funds that
would be available, and what needs the City would have for other programs. He
explained that Mr. Hancock has been in contact with the Community Development
Corporation, and they have looked at the budget for housing rehabilitation, administrative
costs, and that sort of thing. Mr. Beck felt those types of programs should
be a priority use of HOME funds. On the other hand, if there are additional
funds (which it is felt there would be), these should be put to use in the community
-- particularly for the disabled.
Mr. Beck reported Mr. Smith's first step in order to move
forward with the overall plan is to have the City indicate support for the project. This
would help Mr. Smith in seeking other funds for his overall plans. If the
program goes forward, Mr. Beck said future Council actions would be required.
Craig VanMatre, an attorney with offices at 1103 E. Broadway,
spoke on behalf of Mr. Smith's company as the developer of the proposed project. He
distributed pictures of the type of structure that is proposed and where the
development would be located. Mr. VanMatre explained this is specialized,
affordable housing for people with special needs. He reported Mr. Smith
believes the project would be immediately subscribed for as soon as it is announced
in terms of people who want to live there. He said the problem is the tremendous
amount of competition for the type of funding (federal and state credits), that
authorizes and permits this kind of project. In the context of the competition
for the credits, Mr. VanMatre said those projects which are supported strongly
by the City Council have a much greater chance of achieving reality than waiting
until after competing for the credits to enlist such support. Tonight,
Mr. Smith is seeking the Council's assistance by way of this resolution that
stipulates if the project is awarded the necessary credits to make it financially
feasible, and if sufficient HOME funds are received, this development will receive
high priority in terms of its allocation of the HOME funds.
Mr. Janku said a year or more ago Mr. Smith submitted another
application and he was not successful. He said some reference had been
made about a nearby city that did a more effective job of lobbying. He
asked if there was anything else the Council could or should do that would help. Mr.
VanMatre said the more interest the members of the City Council show, the better
off they would be. He said that Mayor Hindman wrote a letter to MHDC on
this project in November. He said that is a good example of what is needed
in order to help tip the scales in their favor. Mr. VanMatre stated they
are hopeful of similar expressions along with the resolution.
Mrs. Crockett said Mr. Smith has built a similar project in
the third ward and it had been a great success. She said there is a great
need for this type of housing, and she is in full support of the request.
The vote on R153-98 was recorded as follows: VOTING
YES: CAMPBELL, KRUSE, COFFMAN, HINDMAN, JANKU, CROCKETT. VOTING NO: NO
ONE. ABSENT: COBLE. Resolution declared adopted, reading as
follows:
The following bills were introduced by the Mayor, unless
otherwise indicated, and all were given first reading:
B214-98 Appropriating ISTEA funds for the Bear
Creek Trail Phase 4 project.
B215-98 Confirming the contract for improvements
in the Garth Avenue and Sexton Road area; appropriating
funds.
B216-98 Authorizing the second amendment to
the MO Highway and Transportation Commission for transit
operating
assistance.
B217-98 Authorizing renovations to the police
building at Walnut Street between Sixth Street and Seventh
Street;
calling for bids.
B218-98 Accepting a warranty deed and conveyances
for sewer drainage and utility easements.
B219-98 Approving a replat of part of Lot 5
of Stephens First Addition; granting a variance to the subdivision
regulations.
B220-98 Abrogating the final plat of the Oaks,
Plat 2; approving a final plat of Springdale Estates, No. 6.
B221-98 Establishing permanent A-1 zoning on
property located on the south side of New Haven Road.
B222-98 Authorizing a territorial agreement
with Consolidated Public Water Supply District No. 1.
B223-98 Accepting conveyances for water and
utility purposes.
B224-98 Authorizing an agreement with Public
Water Supply District #9 for the purchase and sale of water.
B225-98 Authorizing construction of a 12-inch
water main to serve Woodhaven Dormitory; providing payment
for
differential costs; appropriating funds.
REPORTS AND PETITIONS
(A) Transfer of Funds Request.
Report accepted.
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
After receiving the majority vote of the Council, the following
individuals were appointed to the following boards and commissions:
BICYCLE COMMISSION
Cooper, Chip, 500 Longfellow, Ward 4 - term to expire 7/31/01
Murphy, Thomas P., 4016 Bent Oak Dr., Ward 4 - term to expire 7/31/01
Gilbert, Kelly E., 907 West Blvd. So., Ward 4 - term to expire 7/31/01
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CODES COMMISSION
Glass, William, 128 N. Cedar Lake, Ward 5 term to expire 8/1/01
Malicoat, Freddie, 4101 N. Wappel, Ward 4 - term to expire 8/1/01
Watson, Paul, 3910 N. Locust Grove Church, County - term to expire 8/1/01
COMPUTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE
John, Karen M., 1001 LaGrange Ct., Ward 5 - term to expire 8/1/03
BOARD OF ELECTRICAL EXAMINERS
Erickson, Richard C., 1305 Woodrail Ave., Ward 5 - term to expire 8/1/01
Trachsel, Otto G., 3702 Wayside, Ward 3 - term to expire 8/1/01
BOARD OF HEALTH
Nelson, Rose, 2513 Lynnwood, ward 5 - term to expire 8/31/01 (nurse)
Pistel, Fred, 2105 Cobblestone, Ward 4 - term to expire 8/31/99 (lay)
BOARD OF MECHANICAL EXAMINERS
Lane, Henry G., 1816 E. Broadway, Ward 6 - term to expire 6/17/01
COMMENTS OF THE COUNCIL, STAFF, AND PUBLIC
Mr. Beck explained that an agreement had been worked out on
the Forum Chapel project that was discussed at the last meeting. He felt
the arrangement was fair.
Mr. Campbell said he had been contacted about trimming along
the sidewalk on the south side of Stewart Road, between Garth and Providence
Road.
Mr. Campbell said he had also received a complaint about pedestrian
crossings on Broadway. The caller had said it was impossible for her to
walk across in the time allowed by the lights. He asked if there was some
way the markings could be out in the protected area by the planters to allow
slower people to cross in the time allotted. Mayor Hindman said Mr. Burden,
from the walkability conference, had mentioned this issue and explained how it
could be achieved. He said at the Tenth and Rogers intersection, the City
has taken a step in that direction -- there is a raised portion that keeps cars
from cutting the corner.
Mr. Campbell made the motion that the staff report back on
the possibility of Mr. Burden's suggestion. The motion was seconded by
Mayor Hindman and approved unanimously by voice vote.
Regarding the Bethel and Nifong intersection improvements,
Mr. Kruse said along the northwest corner there are a number of kids walking
along the shoulder on Nifong on the way to Bethel. He said there is enough
room at this location to build some kind of asphalt or pedestrian bikeway from
the intersection to the west, in front of the Stonegate Office Park. He assumed
this would be a four-lane road at some time in the future, but he thought a temporary,
non-traditional pedestrian walkway that could connect with the shoulder past
the office park (near the bridge over Mill Creek), would work well. He
asked the staff to see if it could be part of the intersection project. Mr.
Kruse stated the developer at Stonegate supports the idea and if it had to go
on this property, he did not think that would be a problem.
Mr. Kruse made the motion that the possibility be explored
-- a temporary walkway as part of the intersection project. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Janku and approved unanimously by voice vote.
Mr. Patterson asked if the request was to go from Bethel to
Forum. Mr. Kruse said he was not thinking that far necessarily, but if
they could it would be better. Mr. Beck thought there was a shoulder at
this location. Mr. Kruse said there is, but it is being used as a turn
lane for the planned office development.
Mr. Kruse asked about a staff recommendation he thought he
had asked for regarding a traditional neighborhood development ordinance. Mayor
Hindman said he remembered asking for a report on what could be done in the way
of much more flexible zoning. He thought that might cover what Mr. Kruse
was looking for. He said the Council has not received that report as of
yet. Mr. Kruse said what he was talking about would simply be another model
for development that would not have the same kind of setback requirements and
street width, etc.
Mr. Kruse said he had brought up the issue of commercial lighting
and street lighting several months ago. He said at the retreat (which he
was not able to attend), Mr. Malon reported on street lighting. He thought
there had been a request that the Council make a decision about what the City's
standards should be. Mr. Kruse was aware that some street lights had been
removed on Forum to get a sense of what it would look like with 400 foot spacing
on an arterial street as opposed to 200 foot spacing. He asked if the staff
was doing research on commercial standards for the Council to consider. Mr.
Hancock said his office has been compiling a file, but had been hesitant to write
a report on it until the whole public street lighting issue was resolved. Mr.
Kruse said he was prepared to suggest very soon what the standards should be
on the street lighting. In terms of commercial, he thought there were some
models the staff was going to research and report to the Council.
Mr. Malon was under the impression that a decision had been
made at the retreat -- that state highways would meet the IES standards because
that is what is required. He thought the Council wanted the staff to go
ahead and design lighting on streets in residential areas at 400 feet spacing,
and for the other ones, staff was to design them as best they could and if the
Council did not like it, this information would be forwarded to staff. Mr.
Beck said he would rather see a policy resolution written and adopted by the
Council.
Mr. Janku suggested separating the two, residential and commercial
lighting. Mr. Kruse agreed. Mr. Janku said the issue had been discussed
at great length at the retreat, but he did not remember a final decision being
made.
Mr. Campbell said the major lighting issue he hears most about
has not even been discussed -- this involves public facilities such as the schools,
the University and colleges, and other athletic facilities. He said these
are the places that generate a lot of light. Mr. Kruse assumed the commercial
study would include those groups. He explained when he refers to commercial
lighting he meant anything other than street lighting.
Mrs. Crockett felt that Chief Botsford should advise the Council
on lighting at service stations because of safety issues.
It was decided that a policy resolution would be brought forward
on street lighting, and that a report would be prepared on commercial lighting.
Mr. Kruse noted that staff has been looking at a traffic calming
project on Lynnwood. He said a couple of his neighbors had asked him if
eliminating parking on the east side of Lynnwood, for some distance as the hill
is crested coming down to the north, could be examined. He said the hill
is very steep and the road narrows. He asked the staff to include the elimination
of parking in their deliberations.
Mr. Coffman asked about the status of the Stadium/Audubon/East
Pointe intersection. He said a lot of people have been told it would possibly
get started this summer. Mr. Patterson said there has been progress on
it and they have been in contact with the neighborhood association. He
said the City has received the dedication of the easements where the island can
be taken out to allow for the widening. Mr. Patterson said the final plans
from the designer and developer are now in his office, and this includes accommodations
that are necessary for the pedestrian crossings. He said a portion of sidewalk
has been identified that will need to be built as part of the project, and they
are working to implement those in conjunction with the signal. Mr. Patterson
felt they are very close to being able to issue permits on it, but could not
say when the work would begin. Mr. Patterson said the City is depending
upon someone else to issue permits, so he could not give a date. He said
staff would be coming back to the Council with a report after final designs are
approved as some of the items under consideration could be very expensive. Mr.
Coffman understood the neighborhood graciously donated the island. Mr.
Patterson said this is correct.
Mr. Coffman said he seems to be getting more and more requests
from people wanting to have sidewalks installed. He asked if there was
any generic information about sidewalks, or a presentation that could be made
to neighborhoods about what options exist. Mr. Patterson said the policy
resolution on sidewalks serves as staff's directive. He said there are
summaries, similar to what was presented at the retreat, that outlines what applies
in certain situations. He said this type of information could be made available
to the public.
Mr. Janku said Mr. Patterson had advised the Council at the
retreat about the possibility of a roundabout on Creasy Springs. He thought
it had the potential for working well, but said there are concerns with respect
to pedestrian impacts. He asked if that was being evaluated in terms of
this particular intersection. As the Mayor mentioned earlier, Mr. Janku
said it is hard to access Cosmo Park from south Columbia, in part because of
the I-70 barrier. He noted this is one way pedestrians can come under I-70. He
wanted to make sure there would be adequate pedestrian access. Mr. Janku
noticed there is an existing metal barrier that will keep cars from the overpass
area, which could actually be used for the pedestrians. Mr. Patterson asked
if he was talking about under the bridge where there is spacing between the piers
and beams. Mr. Janku said he was.
Mr. Janku also asked if there was any consideration being
given to the landscaping of the roundabout. He said it will serve as a
model and he would like to see it done right from the beginning. Mr. Patterson
said staff has not seen anything near a final design, but some conceptual drawings
have been reviewed. He felt there was an opportunity for the landscaping
to be in place, but in accordance with the normal Department of Transportation
policies, there would need to be someone willing to put it in and take care of
it. Mr. Patterson reported the State would generally make that a condition
of any agreement, but he thought they would work with the City on it. Mr.
Janku said there are some major land owners in the area that might be willing
to adopt a spot.
Mr. Janku made the motion that the staff be directed to work
with the Department of Transportation in terms of landscaping the intersection
and potentially develop some Adopt-A-Spot partners. The motion was seconded
by Mr. Kruse and approved unanimously by voice vote.
Mr. Janku said he had seen and heard comments lately about
the question of construction debris in relation to developing properties. He
asked for a report on the present ordinances in respect to the issue, and suggestions
on what else might be done to improve on it.
Mayor Hindman said there had been some previous discussions
about walk lights at Providence Road and Stewart. Mr. Patterson said he
believed the Department of Transportation had said current conditions do not
warrant the lights. He will send copies of the report to the Council.
Mayor Hindman said one thing that causes a lot of confusion
is the marking of the MKT Trail at the Providence and Stewart intersection. He
said people do not know what happens to the trail at that point, and he thought
it should be properly marked on the street and signs installed so that people
realize that the trail continues on downtown from the intersection. Mr.
Beck said there is a concrete guide at this location, and perhaps staff needed
to talk with the Highway Department to obtain permission to paint it.
Mayor Hindman asked about Providence and Stadium. He
said this is another intersection where it is difficult for pedestrians to cross. Mr.
Beck asked if he was suggesting the street should be marked. Mayor Hindman
said this is correct, in addition to the possibility of installing pedestrian
lights -- but at a minimum there should be marking.
Mayor Hindman said he had gotten calls about the Forum and
Chapel Hill intersection. He said there is commercial development there
with sidewalks. Mr. Patterson said he had received a drafted report today
and it would be sent to the Council shortly.
Mayor Hindman asked about the crossing at the Forum Shopping
Center. Mr. Patterson said it was staked out last week, and construction
crews will probably be putting the walkway in by the first of next week.
Mayor Hindman said he would like to see the staff investigate
a policy that new sidewalks be five feet wide, especially along the more heavily
traveled sidewalks. This does not include rebuilding existing sidewalks. He
asked for a report.
Mrs. Crockett said she had received a call from a woman requesting
that parking be eliminated on both sides of McKee Lane and Rice Road. Mr.
Patterson said staff is doing a study on it and would report back.
Mrs. Crockett announced she has a nephew in the audience working
on a merit badge for the Boy Scouts. She said she is proud of him for sitting
through the entire meeting, and he deserved his merit badge.
The meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
Respectfully
submitted,
Penny
St. Romaine
City
Clerk
© 2024 City of Columbia